Module 1 - Crime Analysis

 

Image 1. Grid Overlay Hotspot Mapping

Image 2. Kernel Density Hotspot Analysis

Image 3. Local Moran's Hotspot Mapping

This first lab used our GIS skills to map crime incidences in both Washington and Chicago. In the last part of the lab, we explored three different techniques, Grid Overlay, Kernel Density, and Local Moran’s I hotspot mapping, to analyze which would be most efficient in predicting future crime from the perspective of a police department allocating resources.

To complete this analysis, I created three different hotspot maps using the 2017 homicide data for Chicago. I began with the grid‑based hotspot method by joining the homicide points to the half‑mile grid cells, selecting only the cells with at least one homicide, and then identifying the top twenty percent with the highest counts. I dissolved these selected cells into a single polygon to represent the grid‑based hotspot. Next, I created a kernel density hotspot by running the Kernel Density tool with the appropriate parameters for Chicago, adjusting the symbology to isolate values at or above three times the mean, reclassifying the raster into two classes, converting it to polygons, and selecting only the highest‑density areas. For the Local Moran’s I hotspot, I joined the homicide data to the census tracts, calculated homicide rates per one thousand housing units, and ran the Local Moran’s I tool to identify statistically significant high‑high clusters. I selected those clusters and dissolved them into a single boundary. These three hotspot methods provided different outlines of where homicides were concentrated in 2017, which I later compared to the 2018 homicide locations to evaluate how well each method predicted future crime.

The Local Moran’s hotspot would not be a great future predictor because, although it has a high number of 2018 homicides, this occurred over a very large area of 52.67 square miles. This is too broad and unable to pinpoint resource allocation accurately.

The Grid Overlay and Kernel Density data are relatively similar, with smaller areas and a large number of 2018 homicides. However, the density calculation is the dealbreaker here, with a high concentration of crime that is useful for a police chief to allocate his resources. Due to this, the Kernel Density hotspot analysis technique is the best to use as a production of future crime and allocation of resources.

Module 7- Neocartography

Figure 1 - View of South Florida Google Earth Tour

This week we used Google Earth Pro to create an interactive 3D map of South Florida. Google Earth Pro is widely used because it provides a simple way to view and distribute geographic information without requiring GIS software or training. Data in Google Earth can be saved and shared as KML or KMZ files, which are compatible with many GIS platforms. 

 In this lab, we first converted map layers from ArcGIS Pro into KMZ files, then loaded them into Google Earth Pro. We also add a legend as an image overlay and organize all layers into a folder. Much like ARC GIS Pro, one can edit layers, points and fonts, ect on Google Earth Pro.  Amongst the layers included population density data points and surface water. Then, we create a guided video tour in Google Earth Pro by adding placemarks for key locations in South Florida and the Tampa Bay region, including the Miami metropolitan area, Downtown Miami, Downtown Fort Lauderdale, Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, and Downtown Tampa. Once all placemarks are created, we recorded the tour that flew to each location, adjusting layers, and exploring 3D buildings. 

Module 6 - Isarithmic Mapping

 

Figure 1 - Isarithmic Map for Washington State Precipitation

In this lab, we explored how long‑term precipitation patterns in Washington are modeled using the PRISM interpolation method. The dataset, originally created by the USDA Service Center Agencies and published through the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service in 2009, was downloaded from the USDA Geospatial Gateway and includes monthly and annual precipitation rasters. PRISM begins with 30 years of rainfall measurements collected from weather stations, then fills in the gaps between stations using interpolation. Because elevation strongly influences rainfall in Washington, PRISM incorporates a digital elevation model and a regression model that relates each station’s elevation to its precipitation values. These combined factors allow PRISM to estimate rainfall for 800‑meter grid cells, producing monthly surfaces that are summed into an annual precipitation map.

Throughout the lab, we worked extensively with continuous raster data and learned how to apply continuous tone symbology to represent smooth, gradual changes in precipitation. We also used legend‑editing tools to create clear, appropriate map legends and relied on the Spatial Analyst Extension to perform raster operations. Hypsometric tinting was implemented to highlight Washington’s terrain by assigning distinct color bands to elevation ranges, and hillshade relief was added to enhance the visual structure of the landscape. We used the Int tool to convert floating‑point rasters to integers, manually classified elevation data, and generated contours using both the Contour List tool and the Spatial Analyst Toolbar. Altogether, this lab strengthened our ability to symbolize continuous surfaces, interpret terrain, apply analytical tools, and clearly communicate the processes and outcomes involved in building a complete isarithmic map.

Module 5 - Choropleth and Proportional Symbol Mapping

Figure 5 -  Map of European Wine Consumption

 For this project, the Albers projection was used because it preserves area accurately, which is essential for choropleth mapping. Since population density depends on the size of each region, an equal‑area projection prevents misleading distortions. Mapping population density instead of raw population counts also ensures the data is standardized and comparable across countries of different sizes.

A neutral tan color scheme was chosen to represent land, with darker shades showing higher population density. This palette is easy to interpret and avoids overwhelming the reader. Five classes were used to keep the map readable, and the data was classified using Natural Breaks because it best reflected the natural distribution of the dataset. Quantile classification was avoided because it would have grouped very different values together and misrepresented the data.

Wine consumption was displayed using red circles, which stand out clearly against the tan land and blue ocean. The data did not need normalization because population density was already calculated using area. SQL queries were used to filter and manipulate the dataset, allowing for cleaner data presentation and more precise symbol placement.

Graduated symbols were chosen over proportional symbols because they were more user‑friendly and communicated the ranges more clearly in the legend. Although proportional symbols are truest to the raw data, they made it harder to distinguish outliers like Vatican City and were less intuitive for readers. Flannery Compensation was not used; even if proportional symbols had been chosen, it would have exaggerated the Vatican outlier, caused symbol overlap in Europe’s dense geography, and made the legend harder to interpret.

Throughout the project, careful attention was given to cartographic design principles: selecting an appropriate color scheme, choosing a meaningful classification method, creating a clear and accurate legend, using effective thematic symbols, and compiling the final map in a way that communicates the data honestly and clearly. Including the projection information on the map reinforces that the spatial representation is accurate and that the data is being presented faithfully.

Module 4 - Data Classification

In this week's lab, we worked with four common data classification methods, Equal Interval, Quantile, Standard Deviation, and Natural Breaks, to see how each one displays spatial data differently. Using ArcGIS Pro, we created a map layout with four data frames and symbolized each one using graduated colors to make the patterns easier to understand. We also practiced normalizing data, saving custom color schemes, and applying cartographic design principles to produce clear, readable maps. After comparing the classification methods, I evaluated which ones work best for different audiences and which data presentation approach most accurately represents the distribution of senior citizens in Miami‑Dade County.

 Then, two maps were generated using the different methods. he four classification methods each display the senior population data differently and reveal different patterns.

Equal Interval divides the data range into evenly sized classes, which is simple to read but often hides variation, especially after normalization, because most values get compressed into similar categories.

Quantile places the same number of features in each class, preventing empty categories but sometimes splitting similar values or grouping very different ones, which can distort the true differences.

Standard Deviation highlights how far values deviate from the mean, making it excellent for identifying unusually high or low concentrations of seniors, though it becomes less meaningful when the data is not normally distributed or when most values cluster near the average.

Natural Breaks finds the most meaningful clusters in the data, revealing the underlying structure, but the irregular class ranges make comparisons across datasets difficult.

For audiences who need to take action, such as planning senior services, the Standard Deviation method is the most useful because it clearly identifies areas with unusually high concentrations of seniors. For a casual viewer who just wants a general sense of the distribution, Natural Breaks is more intuitive and visually clear.

When presenting this information to Miami‑Dade County Commissioners, the population count normalized by area is the most accurate way to show where seniors actually live. Percentages can be misleading because small populations can appear disproportionately high, and equal percentages can represent very different numbers of people. Normalizing by square miles avoids distortions caused by varying tract sizes and provides a clearer picture of where services are most needed.

Figure 1- Normalized Data

Figure 2 - Data in Percentages 

Module 3 - Cartographic Design

 

Figure - Map of Schools in Ward 7

This week, we used Gestalt’s Principles of Organization along with the other cartographic design principles we have learned so far in the course to create a map showing the locations of schools in Ward 7. The main map displayed this information along with general contextual features such as roads, highways, parks, and other environmental elements. Additionally, there was an inset map to show where Ward 7 is located in the context of Washington, D.C., and the surrounding areas. In our map, we had to demonstrate hierarchy, use contrast to show the relative importance of features, apply figure, ground principles to make certain features appear closer to the viewer, and accomplish all of this while maintaining a balanced, harmonious map that effectively communicates its purpose to the end reader.

Different tools were used, such as the clipping tool to select only the schools within the Ward 7 boundary. We also referred back to last week’s lab, where we practiced labeling. In this lab, we labeled neighborhoods, road systems, and the Anacostia River. To make the map more visually engaging, I took an additional step and learned how to convert labels to graphics, particularly useful for creating the shield symbols commonly used for different road and highway systems.

Since there were so many principles to remember, along with the challenge of using ArcGIS Pro, which can be tricky, I decided to tackle all of the labeling first. I fine‑tuned the labels and placed them exactly where I wanted them before moving on to the other map elements, such as fonts, sizing, and layout adjustments. It took some time, but breaking the project into these separate tasks made the overall process far less daunting.

Here are some of my design decisions and the reasoning behind them. 

In designing my map of schools in Ward 7, I focused heavily on visual hierarchy, contrast, figure ground, and balance. To establish hierarchy, I used different‑sized pushpin symbols for the schools so viewers could easily distinguish elementary, middle, and high schools. Their dark red color helped them stand out as the most important features. For the roads and highways, I used standard gallery symbols but adjusted line thicknesses to show their relative importance without overwhelming the map.

I also applied hierarchy through typography. The title used the largest font, while elements like the north arrow and scale bar were kept subtle. Although I wanted a larger font for the school list, space limitations required me to keep it at 11‑point.

To create contrast, I relied on both color and symbol differences. The school symbols were dark and bold, while the ward boundary was intentionally much lighter than its surroundings to highlight the area of interest. I used the same approach in the inset map, making Ward 7 even lighter so it remained visible at a smaller scale. For labels, I used Corbel and Tahoma in medium gray, readable but not overpowering and used bold or italic styles only when according to cartographic principles.

 I made Ward 7 noticeably lighter than the surrounding areas so it would visually “pop” forward. The rest of the map used a cohesive, neutral palette of beiges and grays to keep the focus on the schools and major features.

Balancing the layout required some trial and error. Since heavy elements at the top can make a map feel top‑heavy, I placed the school list at the bottom. Although the legend and school list on the right side made the layout slightly right‑heavy, the bold title and inset map on the left helped counterbalance this. I also made use of the natural triangular spaces created by the map extent to place elements efficiently.

Along the way, I refined several technical details: reorganizing the street drawing order so major roads weren’t covered, experimenting with gradient strokes to add subtle depth to the county layer, converting highway labels to graphics for easier editing, and using 75% transparency behind the school list so it wouldn’t block the map beneath it.

Overall, these choices helped create a map that is visually clear, balanced, and easy for viewers to interpret.

Module 2 - Typography

 

Figure 1 - Map of the Important Features of the State of Florida

The purpose of this lab was to create a map that included essential map elements, follow basic mapping principles, and test our new labeling and annotation skills by creating a map of Florida with specific required features. The following considerations were applied when producing the final map.

Color Schemes and Feature Enhancements

For the county layers, I chose an earthy tan color that blended well with the rest of the map’s color scheme and followed standard GIS color guidelines, where land is represented with neutral tones. I also reduced the thickness of the state and county borders from the original 1 pt to 0.25 pt and changed them to a light gray instead of the original dark gray. This prevented them from distracting the reader or being confused with the river features. In contrast, I made the river features a thicker 1 pt line so they would stand out clearly on the map.

For the swamp and marsh areas, I opted for a green color to represent vegetation and applied a diagonal stripe pattern to give the polygons texture and help differentiate them from the rest of the map. I attempted to use the “swamp” pattern in ArcGIS Pro, but it appeared too sparse and did not look appropriate.

Labeling and Annotation

For areal features such as the Okefenokee Swamp, the polygon was too small to fit the label inside. Following best practices, I used a leader line to point to the center of the polygon. I could not place the text in the upper‑right corner because it conflicted with surrounding land areas and overlapped another state, so I oriented it on the bottom instead.

The city of Tallahassee is the state capital, so I assigned it a star point symbol, which is a common convention used in many state maps. To represent the rest of the major cities, I kept the red circle symbol used in the lab because it paired well with the overall color scheme and was simple and effective.

Because some river labels were repeated when the font size was reduced, and others did not align properly or even fell off the map, I converted all river labels to annotation.

Font Selections

Ordinal values help represent importance and hierarchy on a map, which is why I used the following font sizes. Since Tallahassee is the state capital and therefore the most important feature, it is in the largest font (12 pt), followed by major cities (11 pt), then the swamps (8 pt), and finally the rivers, which are the smallest features (6 pt). Because it is best practice to limit a map to two font types, the main map features were in Constantia, while the other map components,the title, legend, etc., were in Tahoma.

General Map Feature Selections

Although Florida is much taller than it is wide, the portrait layout did not allow me to enlarge the map as much as I wanted so I pursued the landscape layout and also provided usable space in the bottom‑left corner for displaying necessary map elements such as the legend.

For the background, I chose a light gray color that added subtle contrast, matched the rest of the color scheme, and helped the map stand out.

Finally, I added an inset map showing Florida’s location relative to the rest of the United States. I initially considered leaving it out to avoid violating the “minimize map crap” principle, but I thought about the intended audience, likely visitors or tourists,and decided that providing geographic context would be helpful. I used neutral colors to keep the inset simple and unobtrusive.

Important Items Along the Way

The lab assignment required only specific cities, rivers, and features, so all others had to be removed. To do this, I edited the attribute tables of each feature class and deleted the unwanted features. It is important to remember to save changes to the attribute table after making deletions otherwise the deleted features will reappear on your map.

To edit or move annotations, this version of ArcGIS Pro requires using the dropdown options in the Editor tool gallery. This is important as in older versions of ArcGIS Pro the “move” button is noticeable on the ribbon. 

I originally left the major city labels as they were, since they did not require major modification. However, I could not get the font size to change using the labeling properties. I am not sure why this occurred. To fix it, I converted the labels to annotation and manually adjusted the size of each major city name.

I also struggled with the river annotations because I could not easily place the labels in my ideal positions, and when I did, they still followed the original annotation geometry, which no longer aligned with the new placement. I attempted to use the “Follow This Feature” tool to align the annotations, but the tool was not working for me. As a last resort, I used the “Edit Vertices” tool, which allowed me to manually adjust the angle of each letter and word. It is not perfect, but it was better than leaving them unedited. I look forward to properly learning how to use the “Follow This Feature” tool in the future.